Sophia Akuffo Warns Against Locking Ghana Into Costly Oil Agreements
Former Chief Justice urges stronger review clauses and greater flexibility in future resource contracts

- Sophia Akuffo questions early extension of oil contracts before existing terms expire.
- Warns Ghana risks costly arbitration and rigid long-term commitments.
- Calls for built-in review and renegotiation clauses in future agreements.
Former Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo has cautioned against the early extension of oil agreements, warning that Ghana risks tying itself to rigid and expensive contractual arrangements.
She questioned the rationale behind ratifying extensions to contracts that still have many years before expiration.
According to her, if an agreement has a decade or more remaining, any extension should take effect only after the original term ends — not immediately. She argued that such premature extensions should not even receive parliamentary ratification.
Responding to a question about whether already extended agreements should be reviewed, Justice Akuffo criticised what she described as Ghana’s rigid approach to contracts. She said agreements are often treated as untouchable, even when circumstances change.
She stressed the importance of including review and renegotiation clauses in future agreements to protect national interests. According to her, Ghana frequently leaves loopholes that benefit the other party while binding itself too tightly, sometimes resulting in costly international arbitration disputes.
Justice Akuffo also raised concerns about arbitration venues being located abroad, arguing that this often places Ghana at a disadvantage.
Referencing recent disputes involving Tullow Oil, she expressed dissatisfaction with Ghana’s legal representation, suggesting the country had not been well served. She questioned the logic of extending contracts even after contentious arbitration outcomes.
While acknowledging that renegotiation is legally difficult once an agreement lacks built-in review provisions, she insisted that future contracts must include clear mechanisms for reassessment under specified conditions.
She cited the Atlantic Lithium agreement as an example of how royalty structures can be designed more strategically to protect national interests.
Her message was unequivocal: Ghana must avoid locking itself into long-term agreements that limit flexibility and expose the country to unnecessary financial risk.



