“I Agree with Kennedy Agyapong’s Call for Amnesty for Alan and Afoko, But…” – Nana B
Nana Boakye agrees with the amnesty proposal but emphasizes the need for careful, case-by-case consideration before reintegrating former party members
- Nana B agrees with Agyapong's amnesty call but stresses a cautious
- He highlights the difference between suspension and members who’ve openly left
- Nana B cites Kwabena Agyei Agyepong’s case as an example of careful reintegration
In a recent statement that has sparked considerable conversation within the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Henry Nana Boakye, the National Organizer of the NPP, expressed his support for Kennedy Agyapong’s call for amnesty for two prominent party figures – Alan Kyerematen and Paul Afoko.
However, Nana Boakye is urging caution and a case-by-case review before granting such a move.
Nana Boakye acknowledged the legitimacy of Agyapong’s proposal but stressed that the situation required careful consideration.
“I agree with Kennedy Agyapong’s call for amnesty, but we must be cautious,” Nana B said. “The circumstances surrounding each case are unique, and we need to be mindful of the potential impact on the party,” he told Kwame Tanko on the Lawson TV/Radio Ghana Se Sen Morning Show
The National Organizer pointed out a significant distinction between individuals who have been suspended from the party and those who have openly declared their intention to leave.
He referred to the report from Professor Mike Oquaye, which also touched on the delicate nature of reintegrating former members. According to Nana B, the issue becomes much more complicated when someone has already made it clear that they no longer wish to be a part of the NPP.
“If someone has clearly expressed their intention to leave the party, and in some cases, even went as far as forming a new political party to campaign against us, we must think carefully,” he explained. “The question isn’t whether to grant amnesty, but whether that individual truly wants to rejoin and contribute positively or could potentially act as a disruptive force.”
He pointed out that while Agyapong’s call for amnesty may be well-meaning, it should not be a blanket solution.
“It’s not just about offering amnesty; it’s about understanding whether the individual’s return to the party would benefit or harm us in the long run,” Nana B said.
He further emphasized that reintegration should be viewed on a case-by-case basis to avoid the risks of repeating past mistakes.
Drawing from history, Nana B cited the case of former NPP General Secretary and presidential aspirant, Ing. Kwabena Agyei Agyepong, as an example of someone whose situation was handled carefully, keeping in mind both the individual’s intentions and the broader impact on the party.
While Nana Boakye agrees with the idea of offering amnesty to former members of the party, including Alan Kyerematen and Paul Afoko, he emphasizes the need for caution.
He advocates for a thorough review of each individual case, to ensure that the decision to reintegrate them into the NPP aligns with the party’s long-term interests and stability.
The debate over amnesty continues to raise questions within the NPP, with many members keen to understand how such decisions will impact the future unity and strength of the party as they approach the next election cycle.
